Skip to main content

Common Sense 101

Ok dear readers, I know you are pretty much on the same side of the fence with me on these issues - or at least I haven't heard from you if you aren't - so this is preaching to the choir. But preach I must because sometimes the choir needs a reason to shout Alleluiah! Amen!

Brothers and sisters I called you here today to talk about cause and effect. That's right, I said cause and effect. Every child learns early in life that if you do something wrong, you get in trouble for it. This is not a foreign concept. Ask any three year old; they know that if they don't stop doing what they are doing by the time Mom or Dad counts to three something is going to happen. They still may not listen but they get the idea. (Now, men don't officially learn this until they are around 21 or so. This is a scientific fact. It has to do with brain chemistry. But for the sake of argument we are going to assume everyone is on the same page.) So, cause and effect: you do one thing, something happens as a result. Not a hard concept to grasp...

Unless of course you are a conservative Christian and you're talking about education, sex, birth control, and abortion.

If you understand the concept of cause and effect you're probably already nodding your head saying, "I know exactly where you are going Sassy Pants. Amen sister!" But in case you don't, I'm going to spell out a few things here in if/then statements that I'm 100% sure are directly related to each other. "Directly related" meaning pretty much the same thing as cause and effect - if you do one thing, another predictable thing happens.

Ok choir, sing with me!

IF there is no sex education (and I do not consider "abstinence only" education as sex education)
THEN there will be a subsequent rise in unwanted pregnancies, especially among the young, and also a rise in STDs, some of which are potentially fatal.

Ignorance = Babies and disease


IF there is limited or no access to birth control or emergency contraception because of crazy pharmacists and their personal agendas, or if there is no information on birth control because of abstinence only education,
THEN there will be a rise in unwanted pregnancies.

No prevention = Babies


IF there are more unwanted pregnancies
THEN there will be more abortions. It's a simple case of supply and demand.

More unwanted/unexpected babies = more abortion.


IF you teach children (who will have sex whether they sign a document saying they will remain "pure" or not) all the facts about sex - the logistics, the consequences, the emotional issues -
THEN they will be informed enough to make the right decision. Hell, I got so much sex ed I didn't have sex for the first time until I was 20. And I brought pamphlets. Well, not to the actual event but I did discuss birth control with him before hand.

More education = better decisions = less babies, less disease, less abortions.


If you are anti-abortion you should be so pro-sex education it's not even funny. Except it isn't funny because that is not the case. Do I need to bring a flip chart somewhere? Send a PowerPoint to Congress? Can you think of something witty I can put on a T-shirt? Can I get an Amen? Now go out and preach the gospel of cause and effect.


P.S. Here's an attempt at cause and effect that doesn't quite make it. IF you endorse same sex marriage, THEN you are endorsing masturbation.

A positive outcome: I don't know any red-blooded American man (or woman for that matter) who would be against something that is pro-masturbation, do you? Wankers unite! (Thanks Josh)

Comments

Rees said…
When you have lunatics decrying the creation of an HPV vaccine because it might make more women feel free to have sex without fear of cervical cancer, you know the world's gone mad. I have no idea what the answer is.
Anonymous said…
Yet pharma comp throw Viagra down
mens throat by prescription. Who are they having sex with?
Josh Shear said…
The answer is pretty easy. You give everyone as much information as possible, and let them make up their own minds.

No organization with an agenda will ever give full information, and no product is ever entirely safe.

In order for people to make educated decisions, they need to know what's out there in terms of disease (and other complications), what's out there in terms of remedies -- and, more importantly, prevention -- what the side effects are, what the possible failures are, how to obtain the preventions and remedies, and how to seek help at all phases.

The more information you give people, the better armed they'll be to make the decision that's right for them. You don't withhold information from people because you think they're too dumb to use it responsibly, you don't give people false information, and you don't play politics with other people's bodies.
Sassy Pants said…
It makes me wonder, is there an age when some people lose their connection with themselves as teenagers and don't remember what it was like in high school? Kids have sex. Kids are having unsafe sex. And I'm pretty sure that every time you say "NO!" to a teenager it just makes them want to do whatever it is more. A just say no to sex campaign is going to work just about as well as the "Just Say No" drug campaign. Or even less so because at least with the drug oriented "Just Say No" they actually provided background information and warnings about the dangers of drugs. Abstinence education says, "Trust us, just say no. We know what we're talking about. You don't need to know what we're talking about. Just trust us." Like any teenager trusts adults at that age. It just isn't logical.
belledame222 said…
What I think is this: people who espouse that sort of position never learned to trust themselves. So of course it makes sense to them to not put any confidence in anyone else's ability to know what's best for hir.

There was a particularly weaselly evangelical Catholic (I know, I didn't know they were out there either) on a vc I belong to; using all sorts of convoluted arguments to decry same-sex marriage. Finally I gave up on logic and facts, since it just seemed to be leading us farther down the rabbit hole, and asked him:

"Look, you're married, right? How would you like it if someone told you you couldn't have married the person you love?"

His response, roughly:

"Of course I wouldn't have liked it. But if I knew that they were in the right, I would submit. And I assume anyone else would do the same."

After I picked my jaw off the floor, I wrote:

"Okay; and what if you didn't think that they were right?"

He sez:

"Then clearly either I would be wrong or they would be wrong."

so, in some cases, it's not just a blind spot in empathy; it's that they just seem to be coming from (to me anyway) a completely alien framework.
Smith Leo said…
I was looking for this information from enough time and now I reached your website. It's really good content. Thanks for writing such nice content for us. hope to see you again. Visit:- office.com/setup | office.com/setup | | Norton.com/setup | Mcafee.com/activate

Popular posts from this blog

Gone by the wayside

I have no idea if anyone is reading this anymore. If you have been loyally checking back now and again I applaud you. At one point this blog was a therapeutic outlet for me. I'm glad to have a chronicle of my experiences during this time of my life. Now, however, instead of a creative outlet it's more of a nagging reminder that I should be posting and this girl does not need one more thing on her "To Do" list. I'd love for you to explore the archives if you so chose. If you have already done so, here's a brief update: Friendster Guy and I are still together and co-habitating. We are in domestic, but still unwedded, bliss (that status could be a post or two in and of itself, but, as I've just said, I'm done with that.) We're so domesticated we're in the market for granite countertops. We also just returned from an Aussie/New Zealand vacation and if 8 days in a tiny RV won't solidify (or destroy) a relationship nothing will. We're stronge

Making Eye Babies

Colleges often have a lot of rules the students need to follow. After all, a bunch of 18-21 year olds can't really be expected to self-govern on their own, at least not 24/7, no matter how vehement they are that they can do just that. (I was 18-21 once myself so I know it's annoying to hear that. I don't mean all 18-21 year olds individually, I mean when they all get together in one place.) Then there are Christian Colleges which have more rules, often based on biblical teachings and moral dictates. Further down the spectrum is Bob Jones University* which considers the Christian colleges just too darn liberal so they piles on a bunch of morally based codes of behavior. Not to be outdone by the crazy liberal heathens at Bob Jones, Pensacola Christian College goes hog wild with the rules and moral imperatives and makes the Taliban look almost liberal. An article in the March 24th edition of the Chronicle of Higher Education explains some of the rules and regulations the stu

Everything old is new again...

It's been 10 years since last I posted here. Ten. Years. I guess it is true that things on the internet never disappear. I'm honestly shocked I was able to log in. A quick update: Friendster Guy and I split up, amicably, 2 years ago. Since then I've dated 3 gentlemen, the most recent of which lasted a year but once again, ended. Amicably. I'm excellent at breakups apparently. I have just reentered the world of on-line dating and was thinking how I used to chronicle my exploits here. A lot of things have changed in the interim - texting, Facebook being open to all, the ubiquity of camera phones, a new generation of dating sites/apps. But, a lot of things haven't. Men are still...men. The technology may have changed, but the people behind the scenes are still the same. The main difference is that I'm now 15 years older. Maybe, just maybe, I'm also wiser. And maybe, if I cross my fingers really hard, so are the gentlemen I end up meeting.